Is this a photograph of the bottom half of Michael Russell's face? WWeek points out that the Oregonian may have accidentally revealed part of psuedo-anonymous critic Michael Russell's face, arguing that the photo's publication signals that "food critic anonymity, already a farce in Portland, might finally be dying." (Russell remains "pseudo"-anonymous because he often interviews chefs and restaurateurs in-person, presumably without a mask.) Also: a handy guide to photos of all current Portland-area food critics, the paper's own included. [WW]
Loading comments...